Dive in deeper. Scroll down for peer reviewed academic publications
A Circular Economy Approach to designing settlements
The circular economy is said to offer the “world of opportunity to re-think and re-design the way we make stuff”. Could this concept be used to re-design the way we build our cities and neighbourhoods? How might we design places with circular infrastructure—pathways that enable the circulation of products and resources around a neighbourhood?
The death of the city…
It has become commonplace for articles and presentations about cities to start with facts such as that in 1950, 30 per cent of the world’s population was urban and by 2014 that number had reached 54 per cent. Reference to this trend is invariably followed by an assertion that the trend must inevitably continue into the future, suggesting, for example, that by 2050, 66 per cent of the world’s population is projected to be urban. In this article I ask whether we have the courage to question whether this trend is inevitable or, indeed, desirable?
Human settlements arranged as networks of regenerative villages with nature-based infrastructure ecosystems | journal paper
Civil infrastructures have historically been developed as highly centralised, extensive, and complicated systems. Recent advancements in the development of energy micro-grids have opened the possibility of localised, intensive, and complex, nature-based infrastructure ecosystems. The land area required for this approach challenges the orthodoxy of ever-increasing urbanisation, greater density and centralisation of populations in cities. To determine whether centralisation or decentralisation is the optimal strategy we examine research in various disciplines. We argue that a conclusion can be confirmed when different disciplines arrive at that same position. We show that literature in town planning, regional economics, ecological economics, and public health all support the argument for decentralisation reached through civil engineering systems.
Becoming Indigenous: Future Cities as Networks of Waterholes connected by Songlines | Book chapter
What can we learn from Indigenous ways of thinking to inform the planning and development of future cities? How does their cyclical worldview inform their political and economic systems? Can waterholes be created as an integrated infrastructure ecosystem for water, energy, food and shelter? What is relational philosophy and how do we create new stories for navigating life and the landscape?
Design Guidelines for 21st century Garden Cities | Journal paper
This paper advances the development of a hypothetical, systems-based approach to the design and development of smart rural villages – a network of circular economy villages (CEVs). The method is to assimilate visionary ideas from 20th century town planning literature related to decentralisation and the development of new towns in rural areas, identifying key design principles.
Circular Food Futures: What will they look like? | journal paper
This paper explores how circular economy (CE) debates might contribute to, and support, the changes needed for a sustainable future. Full compliance with the three objectives of a CE identified by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation might help to describe a sustainable and circular food future. An analysis of the food system is therefore carried out to determine how food systems may be organised to (a) design out waste and pollution, (b) keep products and materials in use and (c) regenerate natural systems. It is posited that the transition to a fully circular economy will require a paradigm shift—another agricultural revolution—the transition away from large-scale industrial agriculture to a decentralised network of circular food systems
Planning for a Network of Circular Economy Villages | PIA New Planner journal
How might we design Garden Cities in the 21st century to support economic growth in regional areas? How will new technologies, particularly the internet and renewable energy, infuence future settlement patterns?
Strategic Planning for a Network of Regenerative Villages | Journal paper
Whilst the energy transition from fossil fuels to renewables offers significant environmental benefits, the other transition – from a centralised to a distributed energy system – underpins a disruptive model for planning cities, towns and villages. This paper asks: Is it inevitable that large cities will keep growing, while rural communities will continue to be deprived of resources and opportunities? Is the flow of people into cities inevitable? By contrasting the current centralising city model with a distributed network of villages, this paper offers ten reasons why the distributed network is preferable to centralisation.